you're reading...

Misleading Claims: Chiropractors’ Association of Australia (National) – Simply Flower Power (1)

Date: 28/10/11
Code: 2011-09-011
Product: Simply Flower Power (1)
Complainant: Requested anonymity
Respondent: Chiropractors’ Association of Australia (National)
Finding: Justified
Sections Found Justified: Code sections 4(1)(b), 4(2)(a), 4(2)(c)
Sections Found Not Justified: Code section 4(2)(b)
Action: Withdraw advertisement; withdraw representations

CAA - Simply Flower Power

Findings of the Panel

14. The Panel noted the argument presented by the advertiser that the words used in the advertisement were “mere puffery”. The Panel found this argument to be quite extraordinary, particularly when made by an organisation representing healthcare professionals. The advertiser appeared to be stating that the words “natural pain relief cream that really works” had been adopted by them to promote the product, even though the advertiser was in no way prepared to argue that the words were truthful or accurate, and indeed argued that the words were not to be taken seriously at all and were “simply general marketing language”.

15. Contrary to the argument of the advertiser, the Panel was satisfied that the words “natural pain relief cream that really works” are clearly a representation that the advertised product is effective in relieving pain. No reasonable consumer reading the words could be expected to interpret them as “mere puffery” or as having any meaning other than their plain, obvious, and explicit meaning. The Panel did not accept the argument that such clear and plain words were “mere puffery” and that “no consumer would be swayed” by them, and was concerned at the unwillingness of the Chiropractors’ Association of Australia to acknowledge responsibility for the material they had published.

17. In the absence of any evidence from the advertiser, the Panel was satisfied that the representations that the advertised product is a “pain relief cream” and that it “really works” or is effective for pain relief had not been verified, were not correct and balanced, were likely to arouse unwarranted expectations, were misleading, and abused the trust and exploited the lack of knowledge of consumers.


About Bayani

Bayani is an advocate of rational thought and free-thinking; he dislikes ignorance and apathy, encourages others to thoroughly investigate the extraordinary claims they encounter, and to question underlying assumptions about their beliefs.


No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Twitter Updates

  • Sanctions from the TGA’s Complaint Resolution Panel for six products from “Kanion Nutrilife Products” include a Publication of Retraction. 6 years ago

You may also like to report..

- Body Wraps
- Ionic Detox Foot Spas
- "Detox" Foot Patches
- Homoeopathy
- Diagnostic Tools
- Aloe Vera Products

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 512 other followers

%d bloggers like this: